Subject	Don't think so...I was told compression for a TT should be>>
Posted by	Seb300ZX on August 06, 2001 at 7:00 PM
	This message has been viewed 14 times.
In Reply To	Why is NA compression 186psi @ 10.5:1? Should be 154.35?>>> posted by AshsZ (Jobless In Florida) on August 06, 2001 at 06:27 PM
Message	150-180 max
Follow Ups	Why is NA compression 186psi @ 10.5:1? Should be 154.35?>>> - AshsZ (Jobless In Florida) 18:27:48 08/06/01 Don't think so...I was told compression for a TT should be>> - Seb300ZX 19:00:37 08/06/01 I am asking how you can get 186psi with 10.5:1 comp. ratio>> - AshsZ (Jobless In Florida) 19:08:17 08/06/01 You're off bro. Gimme the stock VG deck height and I'll tell - SeedyRom 19:27:22 08/06/01 I dont know those values. What I am asking is how does >> - AshsZ (Jobless In Florida) 20:04:48 08/06/01 You're thinking too hard. - SeedyRom 20:19:55 08/06/01 With that in mind >>> - racer Z 20:41:13 08/06/01 I'd never thought I'd see the day when.. - got rice? 21:15:35 08/06/01 lol! I know a few things... - SeedyRom 21:24:50 08/06/01 But that doesn't answer his question - Marshall 22:07:55 08/06/01 That's because there is more to it... - SeedyRom 22:51:00 08/06/01 I think that's already accounted for - Marshall 06:17:21 08/07/01 As carbon builds up within the cylinders/at the - GamblerZ 22:14:03 08/06/01 lol, that would be a LOT of carbon (n/m) - Marshall 22:17:03 08/06/01 Argh. Nononono. Manual states 186psi for NA. >> - AshsZ (Jobless In Florida) 22:41:40 08/06/01 Friends NA was up to 215 in a comp test...is that ok? (n/m) - Russ ZTT (Jax, Fl) 07:15:10 08/07/01 Do you think temperature could cause that? - Marshall 22:02:59 08/06/01 That is a very good point. 31psi in heat. Hmmmmmm..??? (n/m) - AshsZ (Jobless In Florida) 22:43:08 08/06/01 I have a couple more thoughts about this... - Marshall 06:25:04 08/07/01
Post a Followup	You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.